Should classic 5* be in pve more frequently
- Yes..I would like to use more of my 5*s
- No…I hoarded and don’t have old 5*s
- Nothing will change…d3 wants you to forget about old 5*s and wants you to spend $$
- Snapple facts are very interesting
Should classic 5* be in pve more frequently
Now that Gambit is a ‘classic’ I will say yes LOL
Seriously, each classic will be featured roughly twice a year. And if the pattern holds that will drop to once a year after a while
I voted yes. Not at all a 5* player, have none leveled past 255, and don’t really care for myself who is featured. They’re all just meat bags with few exceptions (My maxed covered Gambit/Thor/DD).
So if this doesn’t pertain to me, why did I vote yes? Because I feel that I would have a competitive advantage over newer players who don’t have every 5* rostered. Also it is very hard to pull a Classic 5 compared to a Latest. So, completely selfish motives.
If if I was more selfless I’d vote to keep things the way they are because really, getting a Latest is way easier for newer players but having 2/5 events run classics still rewards people like myself with deeper rosters
I don’t have a problem with the current rotation but that isn’t an option.
Since my latest are usually poorly covered and/or poorly leveled PVE is all about Gambit + (Black Bolt/Thor). Which means it is just like PVP. And Lightning Rounds.
Really the only thing that isn’t Gambit + (Black Bolt/Thor) now are Boss Battles with special conditions like Kaecillius.
Which is making the game feel kind of pointless. But that’s a different topic.
Having more fights that make using other well covered or champed 5*s a better option than Gambit would be very, very welcomed.
Top end competive pve is definitely not all about gambit.
Truth. If I’m going for pure speed. typically in release events, Gambit barely gets broken out during PVE.
*Closing this thread, as the poll options are phrased to be biased, and also does not contain an option for those who are indifferent about the rotation.
If you wish to continue this thread, please follow a neutral structure, such as the following: