Harder work does have a bigger reward. Since there are limited spots at the top of the leaderboard, you must make all objectives to compete. Miss some objectives, you lose the prize. Only those that put in the effort can compete. The players that don’t have the time to invest, or don’t care, skip the harder objectives.
Well, true. It’s the same because people will either get the objective or not, leading to the same scores. But it’s certainly not leading to less ties by having the 1-point objective be the harder one than if it was the other way around.
I mean the reasoning for the harder 2nd objectives to be only
worth 1 ribbon but the easier 1st objective to be worth 2
ribbons is so that there is no big change in the difficulty
for non tie breaker players. (which usually make up the bulk
of an event)
Yeah, I agree. It comes down to hitting all the objectives. In more progressive events, like Nodes of Power, you cannot get the 3rd one without getting the 2nd one. The total value of the goal is less important than the goal itself. In the end, it really only matters if you win each game in an event, and hit as many goals as you can.