Just opened a bunch of LTs.
4x ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
out of 44 tokens opened. Puts me right around the 10% mark.
Strange note though, all 4 of the 5*s were within the first 10 tokens.
Just opened a bunch of LTs.
4x ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
out of 44 tokens opened. Puts me right around the 10% mark.
Strange note though, all 4 of the 5*s were within the first 10 tokens.
Random odds are random. People just don’t intuitively understand random. Its why casinos can exist. Glad you got the odds in such a small sample!
I opened 24 of them 2 days ago. I got Phoenix with the 2nd pull and then finally on the last pull I got an OML. So only 2 out of 24, but OML should really count as 2. ![]()
Congratulations, a non-selection bias Legendary Token Thread, you’re completely average.
You’re saying Malenkov’s thread is biased?
And congrats on drawing a conclusion about a set of pulls that they OP didn’t even post. For all you know his 44 pulls included 17 IWs
Oh I understand random. Streakiness is also a part of randomness ofc. This is the first time I’ve opened this many LT at once and thought I’d share the results.
45 tokens aint much of a sample, but I was still “on the odds” approximately.
Edit: results overall were fairly mixed. Got a spread of different characters with some repeats.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
or 40 bag ladies, it doesn’t matter in regards to a thread about 5 stars, regardless he’s right smack in the center of the curve. I think you already have your own conclusion about outliers, with statistically low draw rates, at the tail end of the curve, and their tendency to (rightfully) gripe about a flawed system.